Skip to content
ShadowCryptsPredictions
Live
MLB games
Updated

Pittsburgh Pirates at Oakland Athletics, MLB forecast

FinalESPN+

Away

Pirates

14-16

1–5

at

Home

Athletics

13-17

PIT 53%OAK 47%

You didn't pick this one.

Oakland Coliseum · ESPN+

Win probability

Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors OAK.

OAK75%50%75%PITStart1234567Final

Game center

From the ESPN box score.

Top performers

Pirates
  • Ke'Bryan HayesBatting1-4
  • Bailey FalterPitching5.0 IP, 5 ER, 5 K
Athletics
  • Tyler NevinBatting2-3, 1 HR, 2 RBI
  • Joe BoylePitching5.0 IP, 1 ER, 4 K

Scoring summary

  • 5Nevin hit sacrifice fly to right, Ruiz scored.1–5
  • 5Pitch 6 : Ball In Play1–5
  • 5Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul1–5
  • 5Pitch 4 : Ball 31–5
  • 5Pitch 3 : Ball 21–5
  • 5Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Looking1–5
  • 5Pitch 1 : Ball 11–5
  • 5Ruiz doubled to left, Hernaiz scored.1–4
  • 5Pitch 1 : Ball In Play1–4
  • 4Schuemann hit sacrifice fly to left, Toro scored.1–3
  • 4Pitch 3 : Ball In Play1–3
  • 4Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul1–2
  • 4Pitch 1 : Ball 11–2
  • 4Langeliers hit sacrifice fly to center, Rooker scored, Toro to third.1–2
  • 4Pitch 4 : Ball In Play1–2
  • 4Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul1–1
  • 4Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Swinging1–1
  • 4Pitch 1 : Ball 11–1
  • 1Nevin homered to center (404 feet).1–1
  • 1Pitch 2 : Ball In Play1–1
  • 1Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul1–0
  • 1Hayes scored on Boyle wild pitch, McCutchen to second on wild pitch by Boyle, Reynolds to third on wild pitch by Boyle.1–0
  • 1Hayes scored on Boyle wild pitch, McCutchen to second on wild pitch by Boyle, Reynolds to third on wild pitch by Boyle.1–0

The pick

Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.

Pirates 53%

Toss-upMiss
PIT 53%OAK 47%

Forecast Elo ratings alone

How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 50–55% have won 52.7% of 2,871 graded games.

Market
PIT 53%
ML PIT -125 / OAK +105
Pre-line forecast
PIT 53%
Elo + market-implied
Elo ratings
PIT 55%
Ratings vs. market
+1.7 pts
PIT: Elo 54.9%, market 53.2%
Fair odds
PIT -114
OAK +114 · the forecast as odds, no margin
Pregame projection
PIT 3.9 – 3.6 OAK
Margin from the forecast, posted total 7.5

How the number is built

Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.

FactorPITOAKWhy
Team rating14801433Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average
Home field—+18Worth 18 Elo in MLB
Starting pitchers−7−11PIT: Bailey Falter: team allows 0.33 more runs than with its usual starter (≈9 weighted starts) · OAK: Joe Boyle: team allows 0.56 more runs than with its usual starter (≈6 weighted starts)
Elo ratingsPIT +34 EloPIT 54.9%
Market-implied ratingsPIT 52.2%Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context
Pre-line forecastPIT 52.6%15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend)
ForecastPIT 53.2%Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate

Tale of the tape

This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road.

Try another venue →
Pittsburgh Pirates and Oakland Athletics compared, with each team's league rank
PITStatOAK
21st of 304.0Runs scored2.929th of 30
10th of 304.2Runs allowed4.418th of 30
20th of 30−0.2Margin−1.527th of 30
23rd of 303–7Last 104–617th of 30
15th of 309–8Road vs home4–927th of 30

Rating history

Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.

PiratesAthletics
1400145015001550league averageAprJulOctJanAprJul

Against the line

How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.

This seasonPITOAK
Run line13–1515–14
Last 102–85–5
Favorite3–80–2
Underdog10–715–12
Overs–unders13–1514–15
Overs–unders, last 103–75–5

Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.

Head to head

PIT 1–2 OAK in their last 3 meetings; the forecast called 1 of 3.