Philadelphia Flyers at Pittsburgh Penguins, NHL forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with every score and the time left. Above the line favors PIT; hover for each play.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
- Travis SanheimGoals1
- Rasmus RistolainenAssists2
- Rasmus RistolainenPoints2
- Kris LetangGoals1
- Sidney CrosbyAssists2
- Sidney CrosbyPoints2
Scoring summary
- P217:12
Kris Letang Goal (2) Wrist Shot, assists: Sidney Crosby (4), Ryan Shea (1)2–3 - P215:06
Travis Sanheim Goal (2) Wrist Shot, assists: Rasmus Ristolainen (4), Travis Konecny (3)2–2 - P23:29
Alex Bump Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: Rasmus Ristolainen (3), Noah Cates (2)1–2 - P23:17
Connor Dewar Goal (2) Snap Shot, assists: Sidney Crosby (3), Blake Lizotte (2)0–2 - P12:45
Elmer Soderblom Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: Anthony Mantha (1), Parker Wotherspoon (1)0–1
Turning points
The 5 plays that swung the win chance most, each judged at its own moment: the chance with the score just before it against just after.
- P12:45
Elmer Soderblom Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: Anthony Mantha (1), Parker Wotherspoon (1)PHI 0 – 1 PIT · PIT 53% → 67% +14PIT 53% → 67%+14 pts - P23:17
Connor Dewar Goal (2) Snap Shot, assists: Sidney Crosby (3), Blake Lizotte (2)PHI 0 – 2 PIT · PIT 70% → 84% +14PIT 70% → 84%+14 pts - P23:29
Alex Bump Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: Rasmus Ristolainen (3), Noah Cates (2)PHI 1 – 2 PIT · PHI 16% → 30% +14PHI 16% → 30%+14 pts - P215:06
Travis Sanheim Goal (2) Wrist Shot, assists: Rasmus Ristolainen (4), Travis Konecny (3)PHI 2 – 2 PIT · PHI 27% → 48% +21PHI 27% → 48%+21 pts - P217:12
Kris Letang Goal (2) Wrist Shot, assists: Sidney Crosby (4), Ryan Shea (1)PHI 2 – 3 PIT · PIT 52% → 74% +22PIT 52% → 74%+22 pts
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Penguins 53%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: NHL favorites the forecast gave 50–55% have won 51.2% of 926 graded games.
- Market
- PIT 53%
- ML PHI +105 / PIT -125
- Pre-line forecast
- PIT 55%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- PIT 53%
- Ratings vs. market
- −0.5 pts
- PIT: Elo 52.7%, market 53.2%
- Fair odds
- PIT -114
- PHI +114 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- PHI 2.7 – 2.8 PIT
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 5.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | PHI | PIT | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1508 | 1501 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +35 | Worth 35 Elo in the NHL |
| Starting goalies | +7 | −2 | PHI: Dan Vladar: team allows 0.19 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈44 weighted starts) · PIT: Arturs Silovs: team allows 0.04 more goals than with its usual starter (≈35 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | PIT +19 Elo | PIT 52.7% | |
| Market-implied ratings | PIT 55.8% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | PIT 55.2% | 20% Elo, 80% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | PIT 53.2% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Overtime and shootout losses count as losses in these records. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest. Shot share is a team's share of the shots on goal in its games. PDO adds shooting and save percentages: far from 100 tends to even out.
| PHI | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 20th of 323.0 | Goals scored | 3.63rd of 32 |
| 9th of 323.0 | Goals allowed | 3.324th of 32 |
| 15th of 32+0.1 | Margin | +0.310th of 32 |
| 16th of 3250.0% | Shot share | 51.1%11th of 32 |
| 23rd of 3289.1% | Save percentage | 89.1%24th of 32 |
| 2nd of 327–3 | Last 10 | 5–516th of 32 |
| 7th of 3223–18 | Road vs home | 19–2125th of 32 |
| 10th of 321503 | Opponent Elo | 15039th of 32 |
| 14th of 321508 | Elo rating | 150118th of 32 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Puck line | 55–31 | 48–38 |
| Last 10 | 6–4 | 4–6 |
| Favorite | 11–15 | 13–22 |
| Underdog | 44–16 | 35–16 |
| Overs–unders | 44–42 | 50–36 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 5–5 | 7–3 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
PHI 9–7 PIT in their last 16 meetings; the forecast called 9 of 16.
- Apr 25
PIT 4 @ PHI 2PlayoffsPicked PHI 53%Miss - Apr 22
PIT 2 @ PHI 5PlayoffsPicked PHI 51%Hit - Apr 20
PHI 3 @ PIT 0PlayoffsPicked PIT 58%Miss - Apr 18
PHI 3 @ PIT 2PlayoffsPicked PIT 56%Miss - Mar 7
PHI 4 @ PIT 3Picked PIT 56%Miss - Jan 15
PHI 3 @ PIT 6Picked PIT 61%Hit - Dec 1
PIT 5 @ PHI 1Picked PHI 57%Miss - Oct 28
PIT 2 @ PHI 3Picked PHI 61%Hit



