Skip to content
ShadowCryptsPredictions
Live
NHL games
Updated

San Jose Sharks at Anaheim Ducks, NHL forecast

Final/OTNHLPP|ESPN+

Away

Sharks

14-32-5

2–3

at

Home

Ducks

18-30-2

SJ 40%ANA 60%

You didn't pick this one.

Honda Center · NHLPP|ESPN+

Win probability

Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with every score and the time left. Above the line favors ANA; hover for each play.

ANA favored SJ favored5 scoring plays
P1P2P3OTANA50%SJ

Game center

From the ESPN box score.

Top performers

Scoring summary

  • OT4:07Frank Vatrano Goal (22) Wrist Shot, assists: Troy Terry (22), Jackson LaCombe (8)2–3
  • P318:59Troy Terry Goal (15) Wrist Shot, assists: Leo Carlsson (11), Adam Henrique (18)2–2
  • P217:57Marc-Edouard Vlasic Goal (5) Slap Shot, assists: Kyle Burroughs (5), William Eklund (16)2–1
  • P16:59Anthony Duclair Goal (9) Wrist Shot, assists: Shakir Mukhamadullin (1), Mike Hoffman (10)1–1
  • P12:12Isac Lundestrom Goal (2) Wrist Shot, assists: Mason McTavish (18), Jakob Silfverberg (8)0–1

Turning points

The 5 plays that swung the win chance most, each judged at its own moment: the chance with the score just before it against just after.

  1. P12:12Isac Lundestrom Goal (2) Wrist Shot, assists: Mason McTavish (18), Jakob Silfverberg (8)SJ 0 – 1 ANA · ANA 60% → 73% +13
  2. P16:59Anthony Duclair Goal (9) Wrist Shot, assists: Shakir Mukhamadullin (1), Mike Hoffman (10)SJ 1 – 1 ANA · SJ 26% → 40% +14
  3. P217:57Marc-Edouard Vlasic Goal (5) Slap Shot, assists: Kyle Burroughs (5), William Eklund (16)SJ 2 – 1 ANA · SJ 44% → 67% +23
  4. P318:59Troy Terry Goal (15) Wrist Shot, assists: Leo Carlsson (11), Adam Henrique (18)SJ 2 – 2 ANA · ANA <1% → 51% +51
  5. OT4:07Frank Vatrano Goal (22) Wrist Shot, assists: Troy Terry (22), Jackson LaCombe (8)SJ 2 – 3 ANA · ANA 51% → >99% +49

The pick

Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point.

Ducks 60%

LeanHit
SJ 40%ANA 60%

Forecast Elo ratings alone

How often that comes true: NHL favorites the forecast gave 60–65% have won 62.4% of 599 graded games.

Market
No line yet
Pre-line forecast
ANA 60%
Elo + market-implied
Elo ratings
ANA 64%
Fair odds
ANA -152
SJ +152 · the forecast as odds, no margin
Pregame projection
SJ 2.8 – 3.4 ANA
Margin from the forecast, total from team scoring ratings

How the number is built

Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.

FactorSJANAWhy
Team rating14301454Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average
Home field—+35Worth 35 Elo in the NHL
Rest−30—SJ on the second night of a back-to-back
Starting goalies−10+5SJ: Kaapo Kahkonen: team allows 0.24 more goals than with its usual starter (≈16 weighted starts) · ANA: John Gibson: team allows 0.12 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈22 weighted starts)
Elo ratingsANA +103 EloANA 64.4%
Market-implied ratingsANA 59.2%Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context
Pre-line forecastANA 60.3%20% Elo, 80% market-implied (log-odds blend)

Tale of the tape

This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Overtime and shootout losses count as losses in these records. Shot share is a team's share of the shots on goal in its games. PDO adds shooting and save percentages: far from 100 tends to even out.

Try another venue →
San Jose Sharks and Anaheim Ducks compared, with each team's league rank
SJStatANA
30th of 312.1Goals scored2.628th of 31
31st of 314.0Goals allowed3.525th of 31
31st of 31−1.8Margin−0.929th of 31
31st of 3141.5%Shot share46.5%27th of 31
24th of 3189.7%Save percentage90.0%22nd of 31
15th of 315–5Last 104–618th of 31
30th of 315–20Road vs home6–1731st of 31

Rating history

Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.

SharksDucks
1350140014501500NovFebMayAugNov

Head to head

SJ 1–1 ANA in their last 2 meetings; the forecast called 2 of 2.