San Francisco Giants at Tampa Bay Rays, MLB forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors TB.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
Giants- Luis ArraezBatting3-4
- Landen RouppPitching4.1 IP, 4 ER, 6 K
Rays- Jonathan ArandaBatting2-4, 2 RBI
- Jesse ScholtensPitching3.0 IP, 1 ER, 3 K
Scoring summary
- 8DeLuca scored on throwing error by catcher Bailey.1–5
- 8DeLuca scored on throwing error by catcher Bailey.1–5
- 6Devers doubled to center, Arraez scored.1–4
- 5Aranda singled to center, Simpson scored and Walls scored, Mullins to second.0–4
- 5Mullins walked, Feduccia scored, Simpson to second, Walls to third.0–2
- 4Fraley singled to center, Caminero scored, Aranda to second.0–1
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Giants 51%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 50–55% have won 52.7% of 2,871 graded games.
- Market
- SF 51%
- ML SF -113 / TB -107
- Pre-line forecast
- SF 47%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- SF 46%
- Ratings vs. market
- −4.2 pts
- SF: Elo 46.5%, market 50.6%
- Fair odds
- SF -103
- TB +103 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- SF 3.8 – 3.7 TB
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 7.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | SF | TB | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1490 | 1505 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +18 | Worth 18 Elo in MLB |
| Starting pitchers | +9 | −1 | SF: Landen Roupp: team allows 0.43 fewer runs than with its usual starter (≈10 weighted starts) · TB: Griffin Jax: team allows 0.03 more runs than with its usual starter (≈3 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | TB +25 Elo | TB 53.5% | |
| Market-implied ratings | TB 53.3% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | TB 53.4% | 15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | SF 50.6% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest.
| SF | Stat | TB |
|---|---|---|
| 30th of 303.3 | Runs scored | 4.515th of 30 |
| 7th of 304.2 | Runs allowed | 4.514th of 30 |
| 28th of 30−0.9 | Margin | +0.112th of 30 |
| 19th of 304–6 | Last 10 | 7–32nd of 30 |
| 21st of 306–10 | Road vs home | 9–43rd of 30 |
| 9th of 301506 | Opponent Elo | 150413th of 30 |
| 20th of 301490 | Elo rating | 150513th of 30 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season |  SF |  TB |
|---|---|---|
| Run line | 16–16 | 20–11 |
| Last 10 | 6–4 | 7–3 |
| Favorite | 5–4 | 10–5 |
| Underdog | 11–12 | 10–6 |
| Overs–unders | 14–15–3 | 16–13–2 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 4–6 | 2–8 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
SF 3–7 TB in their last 10 meetings; the forecast called 5 of 10.