Detroit Tigers at Cleveland Guardians, MLB forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors CLE.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
Tigers- Javier BaezBatting1-4, 1 HR, 3 RBI
- Tyler HoltonPitching2.0 IP, 0 ER, 2 K
Guardians- Jose RamirezBatting1-3
- Gavin WilliamsPitching6.0 IP, 3 ER, 9 K
Scoring summary
- 2Báez homered to left (409 feet), Madris scored and Rogers scored.3–0
- 2Pitch 4 : Ball In Play3–0
- 2Pitch 3 : Ball 23–0
- 2Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul3–0
- 2Pitch 1 : Ball 13–0
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Guardians 58%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 55–60% have won 55.5% of 2,596 graded games.
- Market
- CLE 58%
- ML DET +130 / CLE -155
- Pre-line forecast
- CLE 58%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- CLE 56%
- Ratings vs. market
- −2.1 pts
- CLE: Elo 56.2%, market 58.3%
- Fair odds
- CLE -140
- DET +140 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- DET 3.4 – 4.1 CLE
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 7.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | DET | CLE | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1495 | 1515 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +18 | Worth 18 Elo in MLB |
| Starting pitchers | −5 | 0 | DET: Tyler Holton: team allows 0.24 more runs than with its usual starter (≈3 weighted starts) · CLE: Gavin Williams: team allows 0.00 more runs than with its usual starter (≈9 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | CLE +43 Elo | CLE 56.2% | |
| Market-implied ratings | CLE 58.8% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | CLE 58.4% | 15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | CLE 58.3% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road.
| DET | Stat | CLE |
|---|---|---|
| 18th of 304.3 | Runs scored | 4.711th of 30 |
| 16th of 304.3 | Runs allowed | 3.94th of 30 |
| 18th of 300.0 | Margin | +0.86th of 30 |
| 5th of 306–4 | Last 10 | 4–620th of 30 |
| 17th of 3026–29 | Road vs home | 33–142nd of 30 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season |  DET |  CLE |
|---|---|---|
| Run line | 53–50 | 53–48 |
| Last 10 | 9–1 | 2–8 |
| Favorite | 14–30 | 26–34 |
| Underdog | 39–20 | 27–14 |
| Overs–unders | 58–45 | 51–48–2 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 7–3 | 3–7 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
DET 14–9 CLE in their last 23 meetings; the forecast called 13 of 23.