Skip to content
ShadowCryptsPredictions
Live
MLB games
Updated

Minnesota Twins at San Francisco Giants, MLB forecast

FinalFox

Away

Twins

54-41

4–2

at

Home

Giants

46-50

MIN 45%SF 55%

You didn't pick this one.

Oracle Park · Fox

Win probability

Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each inning. Above the line favors SF.

SF75%50%75%MINStart12345678Final

Game center

From the ESPN box score.

Top performers

Twins
  • Carlos SantanaBatting2-2, 1 HR, 1 RBI
  • Simeon Woods RichardsonPitching4.1 IP, 2 ER, 7 K
Giants
  • Mike YastrzemskiBatting2-4, 1 RBI
  • Hayden BirdsongPitching5.0 IP, 1 ER, 3 K

Scoring summary

  • 9Jeffers grounded into double play, second to shortstop to first, Vázquez scored, Larnach out at second, Castro to third.4–2
  • 9Pitch 3 : Ball In Play4–2
  • 9Pitch 2 : Ball 14–2
  • 9Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking4–2
  • 6Santana homered to left (361 feet).3–2
  • 6Pitch 5 : Ball In Play3–2
  • 6Pitch 4 : Ball 33–2
  • 6Pitch 3 : Ball 23–2
  • 6Pitch 2 : Ball 13–2
  • 6Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking3–2
  • 5Ramos singled to center, Soler scored.2–2
  • 5Pitch 3 : Ball In Play2–2
  • 5Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Swinging2–2
  • 5Pitch 1 : Ball 12–2
  • 4Yastrzemski reached on infield single to shortstop, Conforto scored, Flores to third.2–1
  • 4Pitch 2 : Ball In Play2–1
  • 4Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking2–1
  • 4Wallner scored, Santana to second on passed ball by Bailey.2–0
  • 4Wallner scored, Santana to second on passed ball by Bailey.2–0
  • 4Wallner doubled to right, Jeffers scored on error, Wallner safe at third on fielding error by right fielder Yastrzemski.1–0
  • 4Pitch 1 : Ball In Play1–0

The pick

Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.

Giants 55%

LeanMiss
MIN 45%SF 55%

Forecast Elo ratings alone

How often that comes true: MLB favorites the forecast gave 55–60% have won 55.5% of 2,596 graded games.

Market
SF 55%
ML MIN +115 / SF -135
Pre-line forecast
SF 48%
Elo + market-implied
Elo ratings
SF 47%
Ratings vs. market
−8.7 pts
SF: Elo 46.6%, market 55.3%
Fair odds
SF -124
MIN +124 · the forecast as odds, no margin
Pregame projection
MIN 3.5 – 4.0 SF
Margin from the forecast, posted total 7.5

How the number is built

Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.

FactorMINSFWhy
Team rating15281489Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average
Home field—+18Worth 18 Elo in MLB
Starting pitchers+7+4MIN: Simeon Woods Richardson: team allows 0.36 fewer runs than with its usual starter (≈8 weighted starts) · SF: Hayden Birdsong: team allows 0.22 fewer runs than with its usual starter (≈3 weighted starts)
Elo ratingsMIN +24 EloMIN 53.4%
Market-implied ratingsMIN 51.5%Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context
Pre-line forecastMIN 51.8%15% Elo, 85% market-implied (log-odds blend)
ForecastSF 55.3%Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate

Tale of the tape

This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road.

Try another venue →
Minnesota Twins and San Francisco Giants compared, with each team's league rank
MINStatSF
5th of 304.9Runs scored4.415th of 30
17th of 304.4Runs allowed4.723rd of 30
10th of 30+0.5Margin−0.321st of 30
7th of 306–4Last 105–513th of 30
6th of 3026–23Road vs home27–2112th of 30

Rating history

Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.

TwinsGiants
1400145015001550league averageAprJulOctJanAprJul

Against the line

How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.

This seasonMINSF
Run line43–5148–46
Last 103–76–4
Favorite26–3917–26
Underdog17–1231–20
Overs–unders47–4753–40–1
Overs–unders, last 107–35–5

Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.

Head to head

MIN 1–3 SF in their last 4 meetings; the forecast called 1 of 4.