Toronto Raptors at Cleveland Cavaliers, NBA forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with every score and the time left. Above the line favors CLE; hover for each play.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
- Scottie BarnesPoints24
- Jamal SheadAssists7
- Scottie BarnesRebounds9
- Jarrett AllenPoints22
- Max StrusAssists5
- Jarrett AllenRebounds19
Last plays
- Q40.0End of Game102–114
- Q40.0End of the 4th Quarter102–114
- Q41.3
shot clock turnover102–114 - Q425.3
A.J. Lawson enters the game for Jamal Shead102–114 - Q425.3
Trayce Jackson-Davis enters the game for Jakob Poeltl102–114 - Q425.3
Gradey Dick enters the game for Ja'Kobe Walter102–114 - Q425.3
Jonathan Mogbo enters the game for RJ Barrett102–114 - Q425.3
Garrett Temple enters the game for Scottie Barnes102–114 - Q425.3
Dennis Schroder enters the game for Jarrett Allen102–114 - Q425.3
Cavaliers Full timeout102–114
Turning points
The 5 plays that swung the win chance most, each judged at its own moment: the chance with the score just before it against just after.
- Q28:23
Jamal Shead makes 26-foot three pointerTOR 39 – 29 CLE · TOR 47% → 54% +8TOR 47% → 54%+8 pts - Q26:23
Sam Merrill makes 24-foot three pointer (Jarrett Allen assists)TOR 41 – 34 CLE · CLE 44% → 52% +8CLE 44% → 52%+8 pts - Q22:41
Max Strus makes 22-foot three point jumper (James Harden assists)TOR 47 – 41 CLE · CLE 44% → 52% +8CLE 44% → 52%+8 pts - Q21:11
James Harden makes 24-foot three point jumper (Jaylon Tyson assists)TOR 49 – 46 CLE · CLE 51% → 60% +9CLE 51% → 60%+9 pts - Q242.3
Jaylon Tyson makes 22-foot three point jumper (Max Strus assists)TOR 49 – 49 CLE · CLE 60% → 68% +8CLE 60% → 68%+8 pts
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Cavaliers 74%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: NBA favorites the forecast gave 70–75% have won 75.3% of 360 graded games.
- Market
- CLE -8.5
- ML TOR +270 / CLE -340
- Pre-line forecast
- CLE 73%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- CLE -4
- CLE 66%
- Ratings vs. market
- −8.2 pts
- CLE: Elo 65.9%, market 74.1%
- Fair odds
- CLE -286
- TOR +286 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- TOR 100.5 – 109.0 CLE
- Posted spread, posted total 209.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | TOR | CLE | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1549 | 1598 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +36 | Worth 36 Elo in the NBA |
| Lineups | −1 | +28 | TOR: Usual rotation · CLE: Stronger than its recent lineups (from the box score) |
| Elo ratings | CLE +114 Elo | CLE 65.9% | |
| Market-implied ratings | CLE 73.5% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | CLE 72.8% | 10% Elo, 90% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | CLE 74.1% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest. Offense and defense are points per 100 possessions, which sets aside how fast a team plays.
| TOR | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 21st of 30114.6 | Points scored | 119.54th of 30 |
| 9th of 30111.8 | Points allowed | 115.415th of 30 |
| 11th of 30+2.8 | Margin | +4.19th of 30 |
| 15th of 30113.9 | Offense rating | 117.05th of 30 |
| 6th of 30111.1 | Defense rating | 112.915th of 30 |
| 21st of 30100.1 | Pace | 101.713th of 30 |
| 11th of 306–4 | Last 10 | 7–36th of 30 |
| 10th of 3022–19 | Road vs home | 27–149th of 30 |
| 14th of 301500 | Opponent Elo | 149128th of 30 |
| 13th of 301549 | Elo rating | 15989th of 30 |
Who's playing
Who sat out, from the box score, and what each absence cost against the lineups the team had been playing.
Raptors
−1 EloFull strength: nobody who matters sat out.
Cavaliers
+28 EloFull strength: nobody who matters sat out.
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Against the spread | 47–41 | 35–53 |
| Last 10 | 7–3 | 5–5 |
| Favorite | 26–23 | 27–46 |
| Underdog | 21–18 | 8–7 |
| Overs–unders | 36–52 | 44–44 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 6–4 | 7–3 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
TOR 7–9 CLE in their last 16 meetings; the forecast called 10 of 16.
- May 1
CLE 110 @ TOR 112PlayoffsPicked CLE 64%Miss - Apr 29
TOR 120 @ CLE 125PlayoffsPicked CLE 77%Hit - Apr 26
CLE 89 @ TOR 93PlayoffsPicked CLE 62%Miss - Apr 23
CLE 104 @ TOR 126PlayoffsPicked CLE 57%Miss - Apr 20
TOR 105 @ CLE 115PlayoffsPicked CLE 79%Hit - Apr 18
TOR 113 @ CLE 126PlayoffsPicked CLE 76%Hit - Nov 24
CLE 99 @ TOR 110Picked TOR 54%Hit - Nov 13
TOR 126 @ CLE 113Picked CLE 69%Miss



