Pittsburgh Penguins at Philadelphia Flyers, NHL forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with the score and the time left after each period. Above the line favors PHI.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
- Cam YorkGoals1
- Noah CatesAssists1
- Cam YorkPoints1
Scoring summary
- OT17:32
Cam York Goal (1) Snap Shot, assists: Matvei Michkov (1), Noah Cates (3)0–1
Turning points
The play that swung the win chance most, each judged at its own moment: the chance with the score just before it against just after.
- OT17:32
Cam York Goal (1) Snap Shot, assists: Matvei Michkov (1), Noah Cates (3)PIT 0 – 1 PHI · PHI 51% → 100% +49PHI 51% → 100%+49 pts
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Flyers 52%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: NHL favorites the forecast gave 50–55% have won 51.2% of 926 graded games.
- Market
- PHI 52%
- ML PIT -102 / PHI -118
- Pre-line forecast
- PHI 56%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- PHI 56%
- Ratings vs. market
- +4.6 pts
- PHI: Elo 56.3%, market 51.7%
- Fair odds
- PHI -107
- PIT +107 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- PIT 2.7 – 2.8 PHI
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 5.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | PIT | PHI | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1504 | 1506 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +35 | Worth 35 Elo in the NHL |
| Starting goalies | 0 | +7 | PIT: Arturs Silovs: team allows 0.01 more goals than with its usual starter (≈35 weighted starts) · PHI: Dan Vladar: team allows 0.16 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈44 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | PHI +44 Elo | PHI 56.3% | |
| Market-implied ratings | PHI 55.8% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | PHI 55.9% | 20% Elo, 80% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | PHI 51.7% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Overtime and shootout losses count as losses in these records. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest. Shot share is a team's share of the shots on goal in its games. PDO adds shooting and save percentages: far from 100 tends to even out.
| PIT | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 3rd of 323.6 | Goals scored | 3.020th of 32 |
| 24th of 323.3 | Goals allowed | 3.09th of 32 |
| 10th of 32+0.3 | Margin | +0.115th of 32 |
| 11th of 3251.1% | Shot share | 50.0%16th of 32 |
| 24th of 3289.1% | Save percentage | 89.1%23rd of 32 |
| 16th of 325–5 | Last 10 | 7–32nd of 32 |
| 9th of 3221–19 | Road vs home | 20–2121st of 32 |
| 10th of 321503 | Opponent Elo | 15039th of 32 |
| 16th of 321504 | Elo rating | 150615th of 32 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Puck line | 48–39 | 56–31 |
| Last 10 | 3–7 | 7–3 |
| Favorite | 13–23 | 11–15 |
| Underdog | 35–16 | 45–16 |
| Overs–unders | 50–37 | 44–43 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 6–4 | 5–5 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
PIT 8–9 PHI in their last 17 meetings; the forecast called 10 of 17.
- Apr 27
PHI 2 @ PIT 3PlayoffsPicked PIT 53%Hit - Apr 25
PIT 4 @ PHI 2PlayoffsPicked PHI 53%Miss - Apr 22
PIT 2 @ PHI 5PlayoffsPicked PHI 51%Hit - Apr 20
PHI 3 @ PIT 0PlayoffsPicked PIT 58%Miss - Apr 18
PHI 3 @ PIT 2PlayoffsPicked PIT 56%Miss - Mar 7
PHI 4 @ PIT 3Picked PIT 56%Miss - Jan 15
PHI 3 @ PIT 6Picked PIT 61%Hit - Dec 1
PIT 5 @ PHI 1Picked PHI 57%Miss



