Edmonton Oilers at Anaheim Ducks, NHL forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with every score and the time left. Above the line favors ANA; hover for each play.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
- Connor MurphyGoals1
- Colton DachAssists1
- Connor MurphyPoints1
- Chris KreiderGoals1
- Chris KreiderAssists2
- Chris KreiderPoints3
Scoring summary
- P317:26
Leo Carlsson Goal (3) Wrist Shot, assists: Chris Kreider (4), Troy Terry (5)2–5 - P31:13
Vasily Podkolzin Goal (3) Deflected, assists: Kasperi Kapanen (2), Leon Draisaitl (7)2–4 - P219:13
Troy Terry Goal (3) Snap Shot, assists: Leo Carlsson (5), Chris Kreider (3)1–4 - P116:50
Cutter Gauthier Goal (4) Slap Shot, assists: Jackson LaCombe (8), Mason McTavish (3)1–3 - P115:14
Connor Murphy Goal (2) Backhand, assists: Josh Samanski (1), Colton Dach (1)1–2 - P113:43
Chris Kreider Goal (1) Snap Shot, assists: Leo Carlsson (4), Troy Terry (4)0–2 - P19:56
Ryan Poehling Goal (4) Deflected, assists: John Carlson (5), Cutter Gauthier (3)0–1
Turning points
The 5 plays that swung the win chance most, each judged at its own moment: the chance with the score just before it against just after.
- P19:56
Ryan Poehling Goal (4) Deflected, assists: John Carlson (5), Cutter Gauthier (3)EDM 0 – 1 ANA · ANA 47% → 63% +16ANA 47% → 63%+16 pts - P113:43
Chris Kreider Goal (1) Snap Shot, assists: Leo Carlsson (4), Troy Terry (4)EDM 0 – 2 ANA · ANA 63% → 78% +14ANA 63% → 78%+14 pts - P115:14
Connor Murphy Goal (2) Backhand, assists: Josh Samanski (1), Colton Dach (1)EDM 1 – 2 ANA · EDM 22% → 36% +14EDM 22% → 36%+14 pts - P116:50
Cutter Gauthier Goal (4) Slap Shot, assists: Jackson LaCombe (8), Mason McTavish (3)EDM 1 – 3 ANA · ANA 64% → 79% +14ANA 64% → 79%+14 pts - P219:13
Troy Terry Goal (3) Snap Shot, assists: Leo Carlsson (5), Chris Kreider (3)EDM 1 – 4 ANA · ANA 88% → 97% +8ANA 88% → 97%+8 pts
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Oilers 53%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: NHL favorites the forecast gave 50–55% have won 51.2% of 926 graded games.
- Market
- EDM 53%
- ML EDM -125 / ANA +105
- Pre-line forecast
- EDM 51%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- EDM 52%
- Ratings vs. market
- −0.8 pts
- EDM: Elo 52.4%, market 53.2%
- Fair odds
- EDM -114
- ANA +114 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- EDM 3.3 – 3.2 ANA
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 6.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | EDM | ANA | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1521 | 1472 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +35 | Worth 35 Elo in the NHL |
| Starting goalies | +4 | +1 | EDM: Connor Ingram: team allows 0.09 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈34 weighted starts) · ANA: Lukas Dostal: team allows 0.01 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈47 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | EDM +17 Elo | EDM 52.4% | |
| Market-implied ratings | EDM 51.2% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | EDM 51.5% | 20% Elo, 80% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | EDM 53.2% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Overtime and shootout losses count as losses in these records. Opponent Elo: how strong the teams each has played are, 1st the toughest. Shot share is a team's share of the shots on goal in its games. PDO adds shooting and save percentages: far from 100 tends to even out.
| EDM | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 7th of 323.4 | Goals scored | 3.310th of 32 |
| 25th of 323.3 | Goals allowed | 3.529th of 32 |
| 14th of 32+0.2 | Margin | −0.219th of 32 |
| 5th of 3252.7% | Shot share | 52.1%6th of 32 |
| 29th of 3288.3% | Save percentage | 88.3%30th of 32 |
| 8th of 326–4 | Last 10 | 2–827th of 32 |
| 18th of 3219–22 | Road vs home | 24–178th of 32 |
| 32nd of 321494 | Opponent Elo | 149529th of 32 |
| 10th of 321521 | Elo rating | 147226th of 32 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Puck line | 38–49 | 40–47 |
| Last 10 | 6–4 | 5–5 |
| Favorite | 26–43 | 6–27 |
| Underdog | 12–6 | 34–20 |
| Overs–unders | 52–35 | 51–36 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 6–4 | 5–5 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
EDM 9–7 ANA in their last 16 meetings; the forecast called 7 of 16.
- Apr 28
ANA 1 @ EDM 4PlayoffsPicked EDM 58%Hit - Apr 26
EDM 3 @ ANA 4PlayoffsPicked EDM 55%Miss - Apr 24
EDM 4 @ ANA 6PlayoffsPicked EDM 56%Miss - Apr 22
ANA 6 @ EDM 4PlayoffsPicked EDM 64%Miss - Apr 20
ANA 3 @ EDM 4PlayoffsPicked EDM 63%Hit - Mar 28
ANA 2 @ EDM 4Picked EDM 57%Hit - Feb 25
EDM 5 @ ANA 6Picked EDM 54%Miss - Jan 26
ANA 4 @ EDM 7Picked EDM 70%Hit



