Edmonton Oilers at Florida Panthers, NHL forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with every score and the time left. Above the line favors FLA; hover for each play.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
- Vasily PodkolzinGoals1
- Connor BrownAssists1
- Vasily PodkolzinPoints1
- Carter VerhaegheAssists3
- Carter VerhaeghePoints3
Scoring summary
- P315:18
Vasily Podkolzin Goal (3) Backhand, assists: Jake Walman (8), Connor Brown (4)1–5 - P314:55
Sam Reinhart Goal (11) Wrist Shot, assists: Carter Verhaeghe (16), Aaron Ekblad (9)0–5 - P313:26
Sam Reinhart Goal (10) Snap Shot, assists: Aleksander Barkov (16), Carter Verhaeghe (15)0–4 - P217:31
Sam Reinhart Goal (9) Deflected, assists: Aleksander Barkov (15), Carter Verhaeghe (14)0–3 - P119:13
Matthew Tkachuk Goal (8) Wrist Shot, assists: Eetu Luostarinen (14), Anton Lundell (12)0–2 - P14:36
Sam Reinhart Goal (8) Snap Shot, assists: none0–1
Turning points
The 5 plays that swung the win chance most, each judged at its own moment: the chance with the score just before it against just after.
- P14:36
Sam Reinhart Goal (8) Snap Shot, assists: noneEDM 0 – 1 FLA · FLA 60% → 73% +14FLA 60% → 73%+14 pts - P119:13
Matthew Tkachuk Goal (8) Wrist Shot, assists: Eetu Luostarinen (14), Anton Lundell (12)EDM 0 – 2 FLA · FLA 74% → 86% +12FLA 74% → 86%+12 pts - P217:31
Sam Reinhart Goal (9) Deflected, assists: Aleksander Barkov (15), Carter Verhaeghe (14)EDM 0 – 3 FLA · FLA 91% → 97% +6FLA 91% → 97%+6 pts - P313:26
Sam Reinhart Goal (10) Snap Shot, assists: Aleksander Barkov (16), Carter Verhaeghe (15)EDM 0 – 4 FLA · FLA >99% → >99% +0FLA >99% → >99%+0 pts - P314:55
Sam Reinhart Goal (11) Wrist Shot, assists: Carter Verhaeghe (16), Aaron Ekblad (9)EDM 0 – 5 FLA · FLA >99% → >99% +0FLA >99% → >99%+0 pts
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Panthers 60%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: NHL favorites the forecast gave 55–60% have won 56.4% of 1,035 graded games.
- Market
- FLA 60%
- ML EDM +140 / FLA -165
- Pre-line forecast
- FLA 58%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- FLA 57%
- Ratings vs. market
- −2.7 pts
- FLA: Elo 57.2%, market 59.9%
- Fair odds
- FLA -149
- EDM +149 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- EDM 3.0 – 3.5 FLA
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 6.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | EDM | FLA | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1576 | 1587 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +35 | Worth 35 Elo in the NHL |
| Starting goalies | −3 | +1 | EDM: Stuart Skinner: team allows 0.07 more goals than with its usual starter (≈47 weighted starts) · FLA: Sergei Bobrovsky: team allows 0.02 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈48 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | FLA +50 Elo | FLA 57.2% | |
| Market-implied ratings | FLA 57.7% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | FLA 57.6% | 20% Elo, 80% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | FLA 59.9% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Overtime and shootout losses count as losses in these records. Shot share is a team's share of the shots on goal in its games. PDO adds shooting and save percentages: far from 100 tends to even out.
| EDM | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 11th of 323.2 | Goals scored | 3.114th of 32 |
| 14th of 322.9 | Goals allowed | 2.76th of 32 |
| 11th of 32+0.3 | Margin | +0.410th of 32 |
| 3rd of 3254.3% | Shot share | 54.6%2nd of 32 |
| 19th of 3289.7% | Save percentage | 90.5%10th of 32 |
| 3rd of 327–3 | Last 10 | 3–725th of 32 |
| 4th of 3223–18 | Road vs home | 26–149th of 32 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Puck line | 42–61 | 52–52 |
| Last 10 | 5–5 | 8–2 |
| Favorite | 24–54 | 35–48 |
| Underdog | 18–7 | 17–4 |
| Overs–unders | 50–53 | 54–50 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 8–2 | 8–2 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
EDM 5–11 FLA in their last 16 meetings; the forecast called 9 of 16.
- Jun 14
FLA 5 @ EDM 2PlayoffsPicked EDM 50%Miss - Jun 12
EDM 5 @ FLA 4PlayoffsPicked FLA 56%Miss - Jun 9
EDM 1 @ FLA 6PlayoffsPicked FLA 57%Hit - Jun 6
FLA 5 @ EDM 4PlayoffsPicked EDM 50%Miss - Jun 4
FLA 3 @ EDM 4PlayoffsPicked EDM 52%Hit - Feb 27
EDM 3 @ FLA 4Picked FLA 56%Hit - Dec 16
FLA 6 @ EDM 5Picked EDM 54%Miss - Jun 24
EDM 1 @ FLA 2PlayoffsPicked FLA 55%Hit



