St. Louis Blues at Winnipeg Jets, NHL forecast
Win probability
Starts from the pregame forecast, then moves with every score and the time left. Above the line favors WPG; hover for each play.
Game center
From the ESPN box score.
Top performers
- Radek FaksaGoals1
- Nathan WalkerAssists1
- Radek FaksaPoints1
- Cole PerfettiGoals2
- Neal PionkAssists3
- Neal PionkPoints3
Scoring summary
- 2OT16:10
Adam Lowry Goal (3) Deflected, assists: Neal Pionk (4), Kyle Connor (8)3–4 - P319:57
Cole Perfetti Goal (3) Tip-In, assists: Kyle Connor (7), Nikolaj Ehlers (1)3–3 - P318:04
Vladislav Namestnikov Goal (2) Wrist Shot, assists: Neal Pionk (3), Dylan Samberg (3)3–2 - P219:25
Radek Faksa Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: Nathan Walker (1)3–1 - P211:41
Cole Perfetti Goal (2) Tip-In, assists: Kyle Connor (6), Neal Pionk (2)2–1 - P17:16
Mathieu Joseph Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: none2–0 - P11:10
Jordan Kyrou Goal (3) Backhand, assists: Colton Parayko (5), Pavel Buchnevich (5)1–0
Turning points
The 5 plays that swung the win chance most, each judged at its own moment: the chance with the score just before it against just after.
- P17:16
Mathieu Joseph Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: noneSTL 2 – 0 WPG · STL 55% → 69% +15STL 55% → 69%+15 pts - P211:41
Cole Perfetti Goal (2) Tip-In, assists: Kyle Connor (6), Neal Pionk (2)STL 2 – 1 WPG · WPG 19% → 37% +18WPG 19% → 37%+18 pts - P219:25
Radek Faksa Goal (1) Wrist Shot, assists: Nathan Walker (1)STL 3 – 1 WPG · STL 67% → 86% +18STL 67% → 86%+18 pts - P319:57
Cole Perfetti Goal (3) Tip-In, assists: Kyle Connor (7), Nikolaj Ehlers (1)STL 3 – 3 WPG · WPG 0% → 50% +50WPG 0% → 50%+50 pts - 2OT16:10
Adam Lowry Goal (3) Deflected, assists: Neal Pionk (4), Kyle Connor (8)STL 3 – 4 WPG · WPG 53% → 100% +47WPG 53% → 100%+47 pts
The pick
Reconstructed from what was known before the game: the ratings at that point and the closing line.
Jets 61%
Forecast Elo ratings alone
How often that comes true: NHL favorites the forecast gave 60–65% have won 62.4% of 599 graded games.
- Market
- WPG 61%
- ML STL +150 / WPG -175
- Pre-line forecast
- WPG 60%
- Elo + market-implied
- Elo ratings
- WPG 60%
- Ratings vs. market
- −1.5 pts
- WPG: Elo 59.9%, market 61.4%
- Fair odds
- WPG -159
- STL +159 · the forecast as odds, no margin
- Pregame projection
- STL 2.4 – 3.1 WPG
- Margin from the forecast, posted total 5.5
How the number is built
Elo inputs in rating points (higher favors that team; 25–28 Elo is about a point of spread in football and basketball), then how the pieces combine.
| Factor | STL | WPG | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team rating | 1538 | 1576 | Elo entering the game; 1500 is league average |
| Home field | — | +35 | Worth 35 Elo in the NHL |
| Starting goalies | +2 | −1 | STL: Jordan Binnington: team allows 0.06 fewer goals than with its usual starter (≈45 weighted starts) · WPG: Connor Hellebuyck: team allows 0.03 more goals than with its usual starter (≈46 weighted starts) |
| Elo ratings | WPG +70 Elo | WPG 59.9% | |
| Market-implied ratings | WPG 60.2% | Team strength as past closing lines priced it, same game context | |
| Pre-line forecast | WPG 60.1% | 20% Elo, 80% market-implied (log-odds blend) | |
| Forecast | WPG 61.4% | Follows the market (vig removed): in testing, adding the ratings made it less accurate | |
Tale of the tape
This season coming into the game, regular season, each number with its league rank (the longer the bar, the higher). Home and road: the host's record at home against the visitor's on the road. Overtime and shootout losses count as losses in these records. Shot share is a team's share of the shots on goal in its games. PDO adds shooting and save percentages: far from 100 tends to even out.
| STL | Stat | |
|---|---|---|
| 13th of 323.1 | Goals scored | 3.43rd of 32 |
| 10th of 322.8 | Goals allowed | 2.31st of 32 |
| 12th of 32+0.3 | Margin | +1.01st of 32 |
| 17th of 3249.4% | Shot share | 50.9%8th of 32 |
| 14th of 3290.2% | Save percentage | 92.2%1st of 32 |
| 3rd of 327–3 | Last 10 | 7–33rd of 32 |
| 11th of 3220–21 | Road vs home | 30–113rd of 32 |
Rating history
Each team's Elo over the last two seasons. Hover or drag to compare on any date.
Recent form
Last five results, and whether the forecast hit.
Against the line
How each team has done against the closing spread and total, coming into this game.
| This season | ||
|---|---|---|
| Puck line | 51–37 | 43–45 |
| Last 10 | 6–4 | 3–7 |
| Favorite | 13–17 | 31–36 |
| Underdog | 38–20 | 12–9 |
| Overs–unders | 44–44 | 40–48 |
| Overs–unders, last 10 | 8–2 | 6–4 |
Against each game's closing line. Books set every line knowing these records: across 3,901 past games, the team with the better record against the spread so far that season covered 51.2%, short of the 52.4% a standard −110 bet needs, and over/under streaks held 48.0% of the time. They describe the past.
Head to head
STL 4–9 WPG in their last 13 meetings; the forecast called 9 of 13.
- May 2
WPG 2 @ STL 5PlayoffsPicked STL 51%Hit - Apr 30
STL 3 @ WPG 5PlayoffsPicked WPG 61%Hit - Apr 27
WPG 1 @ STL 5PlayoffsPicked WPG 54%Miss - Apr 24
WPG 2 @ STL 7PlayoffsPicked WPG 51%Miss - Apr 21
STL 1 @ WPG 2PlayoffsPicked WPG 64%Hit - Apr 19
STL 3 @ WPG 5PlayoffsPicked WPG 64%Hit - Apr 7
STL 1 @ WPG 3Picked WPG 64%Hit - Feb 22
WPG 4 @ STL 3Picked WPG 52%Hit



